{"publication_id":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","content_hash":"sha256:0a8715ef48fc371f96c7737bec854d8dcd5781721fd936cd2ac095970b7125ed","nodes":[{"id":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","type":"publication","title":"supply chain resilience: supply chain performance"},{"id":"claim_1","type":"claim","text":"Does supply chain resilience show a consistent direction-bearing association in the selected source bundle, and where do null/mixed or context-only receipts bound the claim?"},{"id":"claim_2","type":"claim","text":"Outcome-family boundary: direction-bearing receipts concern supply chain performance, while null/mixed receipts concern firm performance; context/model receipts do not test performance effects."},{"id":"claim_3","type":"claim","text":"Within-source caveat: significant dimensions drive the directional role, but the same receipt includes a null/mixed subdimension (Analyzing data via SmartPLS 3.0, the results showed that supply chain collaboration and supply chain agility as key dimensions of supply...)."},{"id":"claim_4","type":"claim","text":"Bounded signal: supply chain resilience has direction-bearing receipts for supply chain performance; firm performance is null/mixed in separate receipt(s), not softened scope caveats across business-outcome, chain-level, and firm-level. That supports only a narrow scoping contrast, not uniform support for the topic."},{"id":"claim_5","type":"claim","text":"This receipt-backed scoping note is a multi-outcome boundary map for supply chain resilience: policy/exposure estimates plus separate descriptive evidence across this 5-source primary bundle (2022-2023). Evidence role grouping: direction-bearing receipts: 3; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts: 1; context/antecedent/model receipts: 1 excluded from effect support. The source facts cover 4 population/setting context(s) and 1 policy/exposure/practice context(s), so this is a multi-outcome scoping map about where outcomes/metrics diverge, without establishing a causal, policy-prescriptive, market-generalized, or pooled econometric claim. The listed estimates remain source-specific across metrics and settings; they are not pooled or averaged. This is a separated policy/setting map, not a unified pooled economics claim. Named setting scope includes automotive firms, chemical industrial companies, firms, and manufacturing firms. Substantive signal: direction-bearing evidence is limited to supply chain performance; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts concern firm performance; descriptive/modeling receipts only contextualize business outcome. Coverage balance: supply chain performance (3 of 3 direction-bearing receipts) is represented more than once; that is a scope imbalance to disclose, not stronger evidence for the topic."},{"id":"claim_6","type":"claim","text":"Role definitions: direction-bearing rows carry metric-specific effect or association text; null/mixed rows carry rejected or non-convergent metric evidence; context/model rows rank, model, or contextualize adjacent constructs. Interpretation: keep these rows separate; do not pool them or treat antecedent/modeling rows as the same estimand. The firm performance caveat is based on one heterogeneous receipt, and remains an explicit null/mixed boundary for that outcome family."},{"id":"claim_7","type":"claim","text":"Design heterogeneity: selected receipts span AHP-VIKOR and PLS-SEM; treat this as a boundary map, not pooled evidence."},{"id":"claim_8","type":"claim","text":"Matrix guard: effect-bearing rows below are metric-specific source facts, not a pooled comparison; context-only rows are excluded from effect support."},{"id":"claim_9","type":"claim","text":"| Outcome family | Receipt | Evidence role | Population/setting | Metric | Extracted finding |"},{"id":"claim_10","type":"claim","text":"| firm-level | The Impacts of Supply Chain Capabilities, Visibility, Resilience on... | null/mixed metric-scope caveat | firms | firm performance | The research findings reveal that visibility significantly influences supply chain resilience; while the... |"},{"id":"claim_11","type":"claim","text":"| Outcome family | Receipt | Evidence role | Population/setting | Metric | Extracted finding |"},{"id":"claim_12","type":"claim","text":"Audit note: effect-bearing rows stay metric-specific; context-only rows are excluded from effect support; role counts below keep direction-bearing, null/mixed metric-scope caveat, and context-only receipts separate."},{"id":"claim_13","type":"claim","text":"null/mixed metric-scope caveat: the receipt reports null, mixed, or rejected findings for the named metric/outcome and must not be softened into directional support."},{"id":"claim_14","type":"claim","text":"Evidence role summary: direction-bearing receipts: 3; null/mixed metric-scope caveat receipts: 1; context/antecedent/model receipts: 1 excluded from effect support."},{"id":"claim_15","type":"claim","text":"Direction labels for audit: descriptive/modeling: 1 receipt(s) | null/mixed metric-scope caveat: 1 receipt(s) | directional association: 3 receipt(s)."},{"id":"claim_16","type":"claim","text":"Specific moderators in this bundle are outcome type (business outcome; firm performance; scp; supply chain performance), population/indication (firms), study design/evidence type (primary)."},{"id":"claim_17","type":"claim","text":"Population/settings are separated as receipt context: automotive firms, chemical industrial companies, firms, and manufacturing firms. The selected receipts group because each carries a fact-level extraction for supply chain resilience; they separate by context (other source context) and metric, so they are not interchangeable evidence for one pooled claim."},{"id":"claim_18","type":"claim","text":"The signal is purely descriptive of source-level direction and scope; it cannot support a causal, policy-prescriptive, or pooled elasticity inference, and pooling across these designs would be inappropriate."},{"id":"claim_19","type":"claim","text":"Effect-support accounting: 1 of 5 receipt(s) is context/modeling-only and contributes no effect estimate; 3 receipt(s) are direction-bearing and 1 receipt(s) are null/mixed metric-scope caveats."},{"id":"claim_20","type":"claim","text":"This scoping signal would weaken if the null/mixed metric replicates in matched designs, if direction-bearing rows fail to reproduce within their named metric family, or if context/model rows become the only topic-overlapping receipts."},{"id":"claim_21","type":"claim","text":"Resolve the null/mixed metric-scope caveat by retesting supply chain performance and firm performance inside one matched industry, comparator, and metric frame before generalizing the directional receipts."},{"id":"source_1","type":"source","study":"Evaluating Supply Resilience Performance of an Automotive Industry during Operational Shocks: A Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR-Based Approach","year":2023,"doi":"10.3390/systems11080396","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080396","population":"automotive firms","intervention_or_exposure":"Pythagorean fuzzy AHP-VIKOR modelling","comparator":"not extracted","endpoint":"business outcome","effect":"not extracted","risk_of_bias":"not appraised in public sidecar","directness":"primary"},{"id":"source_2","type":"source","study":"The Impacts of Supply Chain Capabilities, Visibility, Resilience on Supply Chain Performance and Firm Performance","year":2023,"doi":"10.3390/admsci13100225","url":"https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13100225","population":"firms","intervention_or_exposure":"supply chain visibility and capability antecedents","comparator":"not extracted","endpoint":"firm performance","effect":"not extracted","risk_of_bias":"not appraised in public sidecar","directness":"primary"},{"id":"source_3","type":"source","study":"Factors Affecting the Supply Chain Resilience and Supply Chain Performance","year":2022,"doi":"10.57044/sajol.2022.1.2.2212","url":"https://doi.org/10.57044/sajol.2022.1.2.2212","population":"firms","intervention_or_exposure":"AI, adaptive capability, and collaboration antecedents","comparator":"not extracted","endpoint":"supply chain performance","effect":"not extracted","risk_of_bias":"not appraised in public sidecar","directness":"primary"},{"id":"source_4","type":"source","study":"The effect of supply chain resilience on supply chain performance of chemical industrial companies","year":2022,"doi":"10.5267/j.uscm.2022.8.001","url":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.8.001","population":"chemical industrial companies","intervention_or_exposure":"flexibility, collaboration, and agility antecedents","comparator":"not extracted","endpoint":"supply chain performance","effect":"not extracted","risk_of_bias":"not appraised in public sidecar","directness":"primary"},{"id":"source_5","type":"source","study":"Supply chain resilience and performance of manufacturing firms: role of supply chain disruption","year":2023,"doi":"10.1108/jmtm-08-2022-0307","url":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-08-2022-0307","population":"manufacturing firms","intervention_or_exposure":"supply chain disruption context","comparator":"not extracted","endpoint":"supply chain performance","effect":"not extracted","risk_of_bias":"not appraised in public sidecar","directness":"primary"}],"edges":[{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_1","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_2","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_3","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_4","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_5","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_6","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_7","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_8","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_9","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_10","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_11","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_12","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_13","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_14","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_15","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_16","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_17","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_18","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_19","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_20","type":"contains_claim"},{"from":"99b9c1e0-63d8-4839-9fdd-063f830f7477","to":"claim_21","type":"contains_claim"}],"screening":{"identified":5,"screened":5,"excluded":0,"included":5,"included_or_retained":5,"flow":["identified","screened","excluded_with_reasons","included"],"wording":"5 candidate receipts retained after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering. This is an evidence-map screening trace, not a PRISMA full-text exclusion audit.","exclusion_reasons":["No PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied."]}}