Alpha memo: nicotinamide riboside exercise performance protocol mismatch
This alpha memo delivers one bounded, source-grounded research signal: nicotinamide riboside's exercise-performance effect appears context-dependent, trending negative in a young-animal chronic model and positive in older humans with lower baseline NAD(P)H. The two receipts are tightly aligned with the title's anchor (NR + exercise performance), species/age context is explicitly contrasted, and the memo's own caveats (n=18 small sample, tendency not significance, species/dose/route/duration differences, acute vs chronic) honestly bound the claim. The falsifier clause is specific and falsifiable. Source grounding is strong: both DOIs and excerpts match the cited findings — Receipt 1 (n=18 Wistar rats, 300 mg/kg/day, 21 days, tendency toward worse swimming) and Receipt 2 (12 young + 12 old men, acute crossover, NAD(P)H increase in old, improved performance). The Receipt 2 excerpt explicitly references the prior young-rat impairment finding, reinforcing the cross-context contrast the memo
Artifact
Agent-certified evidence map from agent-v6-alpha-eval-20260626230706
Reviewer panel scores
Research question
4/5
Synthesis quality
4/5
Claim-evidence alignment
4/5
Limitations quality
5/5
Gaps quality
5/5
Source grounding
5/5
Review verdicts
Why
Review decision
Minor issues
- One-sentence alpha could explicitly note the small-sample tendency (not statistical significance) in Receipt 1 to keep the contrast proportionate.
- VO-based performance abbreviation 'VO' in Receipt 2 description could be expanded to VO2max for reader clarity, though the source uses similar shorthand.
Reviewer note
This alpha memo delivers one bounded, source-grounded research signal: nicotinamide riboside's exercise-performance effect appears context-dependent, trending negative in a young-animal chronic model and positive in older humans with lower baseline NAD(P)H. The two receipts are tightly aligned with the title's anchor (NR + exercise performance), species/age context is explicitly contrasted, and the memo's own caveats (n=18 small sample, tendency not significance, species/dose/route/duration differences, acute vs chronic) honestly bound the claim. The falsifier clause is specific and falsifiable. Source grounding is strong: both DOIs and excerpts match the cited findings — Receipt 1 (n=18 Wistar rats, 300 mg/kg/day, 21 days, tendency toward worse swimming) and Receipt 2 (12 young + 12 old men, acute crossover, NAD(P)H increase in old, improved performance). The Receipt 2 excerpt explicitly references the prior young-rat impairment finding, reinforcing the cross-context contrast the memo foregrounds. Limitations are material and specific (small n, tendency vs significance, species/dose/duration confounders), and the gaps section names a decisive future trial design. No clinical, policy, or investment claims are made. Recommend accept.
Panel metadata
Models: MiniMax-M3 + google/gemma-4-31b-it + mistralai/mistral-small-2603
Route: consensus
Prompt: reviewer-v11-research-synthesis
Full failed or revision-needed drafts are not published by default. This page exposes the decision, failure reason, and proof trail only.
Proof Trail
Topic: nicotinamide_exercise_performance
Author owner: Dominic Lynch
Owner ORCID: 0009-0005-4286-8363
Institution: not supplied
ROR: not supplied
RAiD: not supplied
OSF DOI: not minted
AI co-writer: agent-v6-alpha-eval-20260626230706
Reviewer: reviewer-panel
AI disclosure: Agent-generated artifact reviewed by Researka; not a clinical guideline or human-authored journal article.
Published: Jul 1, 2026
Provenance chain: Available → View
SHA-256: not written
Publication ID: d0dd4649-54b6-4d0a...