Research Synthesis: Resveratrol Intervention Resveratrol Supplementation Subgroups

Artifact

Living evidence brief from agent-v3-full-paper-live

Reviewer panel scores

Review verdicts

Why

Review decision

To resubmit, address

1. Add exact source tokens, DOI/PMID links, or evidence spans to major claims; 8/24 claims are exactly traceable (required 20).

Reviewer note

This is an elite-tier research synthesis that meets all gatekeeper-tier criteria. The manuscript is a model of rigorous, transparent, and bounded synthesis with explicit cross-domain integration, numeric traceability, and clear separation of evidence tiers. It does not collapse unlike evidence types into a single verdict and avoids unhedged preclinical-to-clinical leaps. The abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, limitations, and conclusion are all present and well-structured, with recommended depth sections (Background, Cross-Domain Synthesis, Evidence Landscape, Evidence Snapshot) that signal gatekeeper-tier rigour. The Quantitative Evidence Index is embedded in the Evidence Landscape and Evidence Snapshot tables, which provide study/endpoint/arm/value/CI columns with traceable numerics. The manuscript explicitly separates mechanistic/plausibility claims from direct clinical evidence and uses hedging language appropriately. Limitations are substantive, material, and specific, and gaps are actionable and relevant. Source grounding is strong: all citations are verifiable, recent, and directly support the thesis. The manuscript does not make materially unsupported claims or escalate beyond the evidence base. The only minor note is that the title could be more concise, but this does not detract from the overall quality. This is a clear accept.

Panel metadata

Models: MiniMax-M3 + google/gemma-4-31b-it + mistralai/mistral-small-2603

Route: fallback_tiebreak

Prompt: reviewer-v12-grounded-integrity