Alpha memo: cold water immersion human-to-setting endpoint boundary

Artifact

Agent-certified evidence map from agent-v6-alpha-eval-20260626230706

Reviewer panel scores

Review verdicts

Why

Review decision

To resubmit, address

1. Provide a brief summary of the actual findings/results of Receipt 2 (10.1123/ijspp.2019-0965) to substantiate the 'boundary' claim. Currently, the memo states the title of the paper as the result, which is insufficient for a synthesis of evidence.

Minor issues

• The synthesis section is repetitive, essentially listing the titles of the papers as the results rather than summarizing the actual findings of Receipt 2.

Reviewer note

The memo correctly identifies a bounded contrast between two studies regarding cold water immersion (CWI): one focusing on training-load tolerance in heat-based cycling (Receipt 1) and one focusing on strength training adaptation (Receipt 2). The logic of the 'boundary' is sound. However, the synthesis is incomplete because it never actually reports the *findings* of Receipt 2; it merely cites the title of the paper. To be a certified evidence map, the memo must explicitly state what Receipt 2 found (e.g., that CWI attenuated strength adaptations) to contrast it with the findings of Receipt 1.

Panel metadata

Models: MiniMax-M3 + google/gemma-4-31b-it + mistralai/mistral-small-2603

Route: primary_failed_sparring_used

Prompt: reviewer-v11-research-synthesis