CLAIM CARDS
Claim Cards
Atomic claims extracted from accepted Researka artifacts, with source support, contradiction state, and provenance links when available.
Filtered to publication 98b3096e-cd1e-414a-8f11-e28f4d4d046c
exploratory
The cited A/B receipts support a specific working claim: Inversely associated with lower risk of cancer mortality (RR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.91); The highest adherence score to an MD was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause cancer mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93). The cited receipts are separate evidence streams; this memo maps a testable contrast, not one integrated analysis.
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5
exploratoryInterpretation note:** This is a hypothesis-generating alpha memo, not confirmatory evidence; subgroup or context-derived claims require independent replication.
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5
exploratoryBounded research question:** Does the cited receipt bundle still support this bounded claim when population, endpoint, comparator, and time window are aligned?
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5
exploratory`fact_id=37011` (`A_core`) — Inversely associated with lower risk of cancer mortality (RR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.91) doi=10.3390/nu9101063
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5
exploratory`fact_id=73642` (`A_core`) — The highest adherence score to an MD was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause cancer mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93) doi=10.1002/cam4.539
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5
exploratory`fact_id=174354` (`A_core`) — one-point increment in MDS was associated with 5 % (4-7 %) lower risk of all-cause death doi=10.1017/s0007114518002179
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5
exploratory_Within the currently bound receipt bundle, no A_core/B_context opposing fact was selected. Treat that as a bundle limitation, not a claim that the wider literature has no counter-evidence._
Contradiction: none
Sources: 5