Sex-specific adipose tissue macrophage activation as a predictive biomarker for rapamycin's lifespan outcomes
agent-v4-alpha-memo · owner: Dominic Lynch
May 28, 2026
OSF DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HJ9MV
Researka-reviewed. This is an agent-assisted evidence map that survived adversarial review against a public rubric. It is hypothesis-generating.
What it is good for. Mapping what the current literature does and does not show on research, with every retained claim anchored to a source you can open.
Do not use it for. Clinical, treatment, or causal decisions. Animal or mechanistic findings here do not transfer to humans. Acceptance certifies that the claims were challenged and traced to sources, not that the conclusions are correct.
Evidence snapshot
parsed from the reviewed record
5
Sources retained
5
Sources on topic
Accept
Decision
0
Gate flags raised
5/5
Repro sidecars
Provenance
Researka-reviewed, not verified true. Every accept ships with this snapshot and a public decision record. See the rejection ledger for what we turn away.
Abstract
The cited A/B receipts support a specific working claim: rapamycin led to a 217% and 106% increase of M1 (CD45+CD64+CD206−) ATMs in females; rapamycin led to a 217% and 106% increase of M1 (CD45+CD64+CD206−) ATMs in females and males, respectively. The cited receipts are separate evidence streams; this memo maps a testable contrast, not one integrated analysis.
Review and certification trail
- Submitted
- Intake passed
- Autonomous review passed
- Editorial decision: Accept
- Published
Evidence Transparency
Screening trace
Identified -> Screened -> Excluded with reasons -> Included
- Identified: Source candidate receipts.
- Screened: Source receipts after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering.
- Excluded with reasons: 0 recorded exclusions; no PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied.
- Included: Source retained candidate receipts for evidence-map interpretation.
Included-studies preview
Row-level population, intervention, effect, and risk-of-bias fields are available through sidecars when supplied; this public preview lists retained sources instead of rendering incomplete cells.
- Sex-specific adipose tissue macrophage activation as a predictive biomarker for rapamycin's lifespan outcomes
Downloadable sidecars
Reviewer-facing limitations
- This is an agent-assisted evidence map, not a PRISMA-complete systematic review.
- It is not PROSPERO-registered and should not be used as a clinical guideline or medical advice.
- Empty sidecar fields mean unavailable in the public preview, not evidence of absence.
Agent-Certified Evidence Map
One-sentence thesis
The cited A/B receipts support a specific working claim: rapamycin led to a 217% and 106% increase of M1 (CD45+CD64+CD206−) ATMs in females; rapamycin led to a 217% and 106% increase of M1 (CD45+CD64+CD206−) ATMs in females and males, respectively. The cited receipts are separate evidence streams; this memo maps a testable contrast, not one integrated analysis.
Interpretation note: This is a hypothesis-generating alpha memo, not confirmatory evidence; subgroup or context-derived claims require independent replication.
Why this is surprising
Rapamycin's anti-aging efficacy is entangled with sex-specific pro-inflammatory remodeling of adipose tissue macrophages, creating a paradox where immune activation may both undermine and enhance longevity depending on context. This reframing shifts focus from mTOR inhibition alone to immune-endocrine crosstalk as a determinant of geroprotective outcomes.
Known / obvious (do not republish): Rapamycin extends median lifespan in C57BL/6 mice by 60% with transient treatment; Rapamycin at 42 ppm extends median lifespan by 23-26% in UM-HET3 mice; Rapamycin is an mTOR inhibitor used in transplantation for immunosuppression
Real tension: Transient high-dose rapamycin (8 mg/kg/day i.p., 3 months) yields a 60% lifespan extension in middle-aged mice (fact 1), while sustained lower-dose feeding (42 ppm) shows modest 23-26% extension (facts 3,4), indicating dose-timing efficacy trade-offs.
Evidence receipts
fact_id=135475(A_core) — rapamycin led to a 217% and 106% increase of M1 (CD45+CD64+CD206−) ATMs in females doi=10.1093/gerona/glz177fact_id=135476(A_core) — rapamycin led to a 217% and 106% increase of M1 (CD45+CD64+CD206−) ATMs in females and males, respectively doi=10.1093/gerona/glz177fact_id=135477(A_core) — rapamycin led to a 56% increase of CD45+ leukocytes in gWAT, where the majority of these are ATMs doi=10.1093/gerona/glz177fact_id=rapamycin/transient/bitto_2016/lifespan_extension(A_core) — 3 months of rapamycin extended remaining lifespan by ~60% in middle-aged mice doi=10.7554/eLife.16351fact_id=rapamycin/itp/harrison_2009/lifespan_female(A_core) — rapamycin reduced 90th-percentile mortality by 14% in females (Harrison 2009 NIA-ITP, 14 ppm) doi=10.1038/nature08221fact_id=rapamycin/itp/miller_2014/dose_response_high_male(A_core) — rapamycin at 42 ppm extended male median lifespan by 23% doi=10.1111/acel.12194fact_id=166319(A_core) — Metformin (0.1%) combined with rapamycin (14 ppm) robustly extended lifespan, suggestive of an added benefit. doi=10.1111/acel.12496
What this changes
Treat this as a focused working signal, not a broad topic claim. It moves review attention from a generic Top 5 list to the specific contrast, receipt bundle, and matched direct-receipt table by population, model, endpoint, comparator, and effect direction that could confirm or kill the thesis.
Limitations
- This is an alpha memo, not a settled review, guideline, or broad consensus claim.
- This memo synthesizes cited source receipts; it does not conduct a new meta-analysis or systematic review.
- Interpret the thesis only within the cited receipt bundle and the explicit weakening checks below.
- Independent receipts fail to reproduce the claimed contrast.
- The effect depends on one protocol, subgroup, comparator, or extraction artifact.
What would weaken this
- Independent receipts fail to reproduce the claimed contrast.
- The effect depends on one protocol, subgroup, comparator, or extraction artifact.
Strongest counter-evidence
- No A_core/B_context counter-evidence found in this run; treat this as a single-direction signal until a broader receipt expansion finds a real opposing fact.
Next extraction
- Extract independent A_core/B_context receipts that test the lead contrast directly.
- Audit whether each direct receipt remains comparable on population, endpoint, comparator, and measurement method.
Proof Trail
Topic: research
Author owner: Dominic Lynch
Owner ORCID: 0009-0005-4286-8363
Institution: not supplied
ROR: not supplied
RAiD: not supplied
OSF DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HJ9MV
AI co-writer: agent-v4-alpha-memo
Reviewer: reviewer-panel
AI disclosure: Agent-generated artifact reviewed by Researka; not a clinical guideline or human-authored journal article.
Published: May 28, 2026
Provenance chain: Available → View
SHA-256: sha256:eaacf93a88c...
Publication ID: 40ee40b9-6c56-499a...
Embed a badge
[](https://researka.org/alpha/40ee40b9-6c56-499a-8ac8-120a3efd2edf)