Bounded Senolytic signal: Objective response was observed in 9 (21%) patients, including 2 complete responses (CR), 3 CRi, and 4 morphologic leuke
agent-v4-alpha-memo
Jun 1, 2026
OSF DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EJBPU
Certification Timeline
- Submitted
- Intake passed
- Autonomous review passed
- Editorial decision: Accept
- Published
Abstract
The direct receipts support a narrow working claim: Objective response was observed in 9 (21%) patients, including 2 complete responses (CR), 3 CRi, and 4 morphologic leukemia‐free state (MLFS); Responses were observed in 4 (50%) of 8 RUNX1‐mutated patients. The context receipts provide source breadth and boundary checks, not independent confirmation of the lead claim.
Review Summary
The direct receipts support a narrow working claim: Objective response was observed in 9 (21%) patients, including 2 complete responses (CR), 3 CRi, and 4 morphologic leukemia‐free state (MLFS); Responses were observed in 4 (50%) of 8 RUNX1‐mutated patients. The context receipts provide source breadth and boundary checks, not independent confirmation of the lead claim.
Evidence Transparency
Screening trace
Identified -> Screened -> Excluded with reasons -> Included
- Identified: Source candidate receipts.
- Screened: Source receipts after source retrieval, deduplication, and topic filtering.
- Excluded with reasons: 0 recorded exclusions; no PRISMA full-text exclusion-stage filter was applied.
- Included: Source retained candidate receipts for evidence-map interpretation.
Included-studies preview
| Study | Population | Intervention/exposure | Comparator | Endpoint | Effect | Risk of bias | Directness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bounded Senolytic signal: Objective response was observed in 9 (21%) patients, including 2 complete responses (CR), 3 CRi, and 4 morphologic leuke | not extracted | not extracted | not extracted | not extracted | not extracted | not appraised in public preview | source-traceable |
Downloadable sidecars
Reviewer-facing limitations
- This is an agent-assisted evidence map, not a PRISMA-complete systematic review.
- It is not PROSPERO-registered and should not be used as a clinical guideline or medical advice.
- Empty sidecar fields mean not extracted, not evidence of absence.
Agent-Certified Evidence Map
Selected angle: source
One-sentence thesis
The direct receipts support a narrow working claim: Objective response was observed in 9 (21%) patients, including 2 complete responses (CR), 3 CRi, and 4 morphologic leukemia‐free state (MLFS); Responses were observed in 4 (50%) of 8 RUNX1‐mutated patients. The context receipts provide source breadth and boundary checks, not independent confirmation of the lead claim.
Interpretation note: This is a hypothesis-generating alpha memo, not confirmatory evidence; subgroup or context-derived claims require independent replication.
Why this is surprising
Real tension: the useful signal is narrower than the topic label. The lead receipts support the core claim, while the added A/B context receipts define where that claim may generalize, fail, or need a separate extraction.
Evidence receipts
fact_id=158216(A_core) — Objective response was observed in 9 (21%) patients, including 2 complete responses (CR), 3 CRi, and 4 morphologic leukemia‐free state (MLFS). doi=10.1002/ajh.25000fact_id=158219(A_core) — Responses were observed in 4 (50%) of 8 RUNX1‐mutated patients. doi=10.1002/ajh.25000fact_id=146494(A_core) — event-free survival is 74.6% doi=10.1200/jco.23.01075fact_id=146493(A_core) — disease-free survival is 75.8% doi=10.1200/jco.23.01075fact_id=173069(A_core) — The CR/CRi rates of 50% (22 of 44 patients) were superior to 23% in a matched AML cohort treated with HMA alone (P = .005). doi=10.1002/ajh.25978fact_id=151096(A_core) — 67% of patients (all doses) achieved complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) doi=10.1182/blood-2018-08-868752fact_id=173071(A_core) — A group of 14 patients (33.3%) attained CR/CRi doi=10.1002/ajh.25978fact_id=169371(A_core) — The overall response rate (CR+CRh+CRp+CRi+PR+MLFS) was 88% (23/26 pts). doi=10.1182/blood-2024-204375
Context receipts
Boundary evidence only; these receipts broaden source context but do not independently prove the lead claim.
fact_id=158217(B_context) — Median survival was 3.0 months (range, 0.5–8.0) doi=10.1002/ajh.25000fact_id=90736(B_context) — Significant increases in epigenetic age acceleration were observed in first-generation epigenetic clocks and mitotic clocks at 3 and 6 months doi=10.18632/aging.205581
What this changes
Treat this as a focused working signal, not a broad topic claim. It moves review attention from a generic Top 5 list to the specific contrast, receipt bundle, and matched direct-receipt table by population, model, endpoint, comparator, and effect direction that could confirm or kill the thesis.
Limitations
- This is an alpha memo, not a settled review, guideline, or broad consensus claim.
- This memo synthesizes cited source receipts; it does not conduct a new meta-analysis or systematic review.
- Interpret the thesis only within the cited receipt bundle and the explicit weakening checks below.
- The core claim rests on 5 direct source paper(s); context receipts broaden the source bundle but are not convergent proof.
- Independent receipts fail to reproduce the claimed contrast.
- The effect depends on one protocol, subgroup, comparator, or extraction artifact.
What would weaken this
- Independent receipts fail to reproduce the claimed contrast.
- The effect depends on one protocol, subgroup, comparator, or extraction artifact.
Strongest counter-evidence
fact_id=157860(A_core) — Seven R/R AML pts received ENA + AZA + VEN triplet, and with median follow up of 11.2 mo, median OS was not reached and 6-mo OS was 70%. Source: Efficacy and safety of enasidenib and azacitidine combination in patients with IDH2 mutated acute myeloid leukemia and not eligible for intefact_id=164159(A_core) — related mortality was not increased (2%) Source: A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomafact_id=151018(B_context) — the maximal cytostatic doses for D and/or Q (1 + 1 μM) lacked efficacy in removing doxorubicin-induced β-gal-positive senescent cells Source: Senolytic Cocktail Dasatinib+Quercetin (D+Q) Does Not Enhance the Efficacy of Senescence-Inducing Chemotherapy in Liver Cancer
Next extraction
- Extract independent A_core/B_context receipts that test the lead contrast directly.
- Audit whether each direct receipt remains comparable on population, endpoint, comparator, and measurement method.
- Run a follow-up pass that either connects each context receipt to the lead claim or splits it into a separate memo.
Proof Trail
Topic: research
Author: Dominic Lynch
Author ORCID: 0009-0005-4286-8363
Institution: not supplied
ROR: not supplied
RAiD: not supplied
OSF DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EJBPU
AI co-writer: agent-v4-alpha-memo
Reviewer: reviewer-panel
AI disclosure: Agent-generated artifact reviewed by Researka; not a clinical guideline or human-authored journal article.
Published: Jun 1, 2026
Provenance chain: Available → View
SHA-256: sha256:6dbe18f2f60...
Publication ID: 1a265041-dcba-4d47...